Wednesday, November 8, 2017
The League of Women Voters of Plainfield would like to congratulate all the winners of yesterday's election, and would also like to thank ALL the candidates, whose commitment to public service has earned them the respect of our citizenry. Below are the unofficial results for the City of Plainfield, municipal and school board, from the Union County Clerk's office. Click on the photo to enlarge. Click on the link to see the statewide and county election results. The deadline for the County Clerk to transmit the Official General Election Results to the Secretary of State is November 16.
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
Wednesday, November 1, 2017
Please come out to the League of Women Voters of Plainfield Candidate Forum, which is being held this evening at Emerson Community School at 6:30 PM. Please click on the "Candid Forum Rules" page for our guidelines, as well as for clarification regarding Write-In Candidates. Below you will find the agenda and guidelines for this evening's forum.
AGENDA & GUIDELINES
1. Welcome and pledge of allegiance by League member.
2. Introduction of forum moderator Marlene Sincaglia.
3. Explanation of format and introduction of candidates by moderator. Moderator will determine order of statements.
· William Contreras
· Cameron Cox
· Terence Johnson
· Tera Phipps
· Timothy A. Priano
· Dr. Avania Richardson-Miller
· Harry M. Watson, Jr.
4. Opening statements of candidates—1 ½ minutes for each opening statement.
5. Written questions from cards submitted by the audience until 15 minutes before forum’s end.
- The candidate to whom the question is addressed will have 1 ½ minutes to answer the question.
- A rebuttal of 1 minute from the opposing candidates will be allowed but not required.
6. General Rules regarding questions:
- A candidate may refuse to answer a question, but in that instance the other candidate may answer, if they desire.
- Questions must follow the League policy of being concerned with issues, not personalities. All others will be ruled out of order by the Moderator.
- A timekeeper shall sit in full view of the candidates to indicate that the time is finished. A sentence may be completed, but under no circumstances will a speaker be allowed to extend the specific time.
7. Each candidate will have 1 ½ minutes for closing statements. The candidates will speak in reverse order of opening statements.
8. Closing Words by League Member – Vacate building.
Wednesday, October 25, 2017
Public Questions on 2017 Election Ballot: Q.1 - Library Construction Bond and Q. 2 - Environmental Projects Amendment
In addition to candidate selections in the 2017 election, two public questions are also on the ballot. Below are the questions, in English and in Spanish, their respective interpretive statements, and background information from the League of Women Voters of New Jersey (LWVNJ) Education Fund, along with reasons to vote "YES" or "NO" on each public question.
PUBLIC QUESTION #1 - NEW JERSEY LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION BOND ACT
Question: Do you approve the “New Jersey Library Construction Bond Act’? This bond act authorizes the State to issue bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $125 million. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to provide grants to public libraries. The grants will be used to build, equip and expand public libraries to increase capacity and serve the public.
Interpretive Statement: Approval of this bond act will allow the State to sell $125 million in State general obligation bonds. Proceeds from the bonds will be used to provide grants to construct, expand and equip public libraries. Municipalities or counties that fund public libraries will match the grant amount. The municipality or county may solicit private funding to support its match. The State Librarian, in consultation with the President of Thomas Edison State University, will set eligibility criteria for the grants.
PREGUNTA PÚBLICA #1 – LEY DE BONO PARA LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DE BIBLIOTECAS DE NEW JERSEY
Pregunta: ¿Aprueba usted la “Ley de Bono para la Construcción de Bibliotecas de New Jersey”? Esta ley de bono autoriza al Estado a emitir bonos por el monto de capital total de $125 millones. Los fondos provenientes de estos bonos se utilizarán para dar subsidios a bibliotecas públicas. Los subsidios se usarán para construir, equipar y ampliar las bibliotecas públicas para aumentar la capacidad y atender al público.
Declaración interpretative: La aprobación de esta ley de bono permitirá que el Estado venda $125 millones en bonos de obligaciones generales del Estado. Los fondos provenientes de los bonos se utilizarán para dar subsidios para construir, ampliar y equipar a las bibliotecas públicas. Las municipalidades o condados que financien las bibliotecas públicas igualarán el monto del subsidio. La municipalidad o condado podrá obtener fondos privados para contribuir con su aporte. El Bibliotecario Estatal, en consulta con el Presidente de la Universidad Estatal Thomas Edison, establecerá los criterios de elegibilidad para los subsidios.
LWVNJ Education Fund Background on Public Question #1
If approved, the State of New Jersey can borrow $125 million for capital project grants to public libraries. The municipality or county that funds the library seeking such a grant must put up half of the cost of the project for which grant funds are sought, but may solicit and receive grants or funds from any private source to support its required share of the project. The Office of Legislative Services estimates that the total debt service costs to the State may range from $233 million to $300 million spread over 35 years.
A Capital Improvement Survey of local public libraries, done by the New Jersey Library Association in late 2014, found that most libraries reported having capital needs, from upgrades to become ADA compliant to space, electrical, or furniture improvements. The survey did not, however, indicate the severity of these needs, nor the potential for funding them with local tax dollars. Due to the challenging economic times, few libraries receive regular capital appropriations.
If the act is approved by the voters, the State Librarian and the President of Thomas Edison State University will establish criteria for grants and evaluate the proposals from local libraries against the criteria, and prepare a list of eligible projects.
Reasons to vote yes:
- The additional funding could improve access to public libraries for many vulnerable residents.
- The additional funding could help keep public libraries abreast of increasing technology needs.
- The construction and equipment purchases involved would provide an economic stimulus to our New Jersey economy.
Reasons to vote no:
- New Jersey already has an extremely high debt burden. This bond issue would add to it.
- The amount is very restricted in purpose, and does not allow libraries to apply grants to their greatest needs, which may be personnel rather than space-related.
- The criteria for distributing funds have not been developed.
PUBLIC QUESTION #2 - NEW JERSEY REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES LAWSUITS DEDICATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS AMENDMENT
Question: Do you approve amending the Constitution to dedicate all moneys collected by the State relating to natural resource damages in cases of contamination of the environment? The moneys would have to be used to repair, restore, replace, or preserve the State’s natural resources. The moneys may also be used to pay legal or other costs incurred by the State in pursuing its claims.
Interpretive Statement: This amendment would dedicate moneys collected by the State relating to natural resource damages through settlements or awards for legal claims based on environmental contamination. These moneys would be dedicated to repair, replace, or restore damaged natural resources, or to preserve the State’s natural resources. These moneys would be spent in an area as close as possible to the geographical area in which the damage occurred. The moneys could also be used to pay for the State’s legal or other costs in pursuing the claims. Currently, these moneys may be used for any State purpose.
PREGUNTA PUBLICA #2 – ENMIENDA CONSTITUCIONAL PARA DESTINAR FONDOS DE CASOS ESTATALES DE CONTAMINACIÓN AMBIENTAL
Pregunta: ¿Aprueba usted que se enmiende la Constitución para que se destinen todos los fondos recaudados por el Estado en relación con daños a los recursos naturales en casos de contaminación del medioambiente? Los fondos tendrían que usarse para reparar, restaurar, reemplazar o preservar los recursos naturales del Estado. Los fondos también podrán utilizarse para pagar los costos legales u otros costos en que el Estado incurra al entablar sus reclamos.
Declaración interpretativa: Esta enmienda destinaría los fondos que el Estado hubiera recaudado en relación con daños a los recursos naturales a través de acuerdos extrajudiciales o laudos por los reclamos legales por la contaminación ambiental. Estos fondos se destinarían a reparar, reemplazar o restaurar los recursos naturales dañados o para preservar los recursos naturales del Estado. Los fondos se emplearían en un área tan cercana como sea posible al área geográfica en la cual ocurrió el daño. Los fondos también podrían utilizarse para pagar los costos legales u otros costos en que el Estado incurra al entablar sus reclamos. Actualmente, estos fondos pueden usarse para cualquier fin estatal.
LWVNJ Education Fund Background on Public Question #2
This question would amend the NJ State Constitution to restrict the use of moneys received by the state from environmental damages lawsuits so that such moneys are dedicated only to environmental restoration purposes. This type of constitutional amendment is commonly known as a “lockbox” amendment similar to the 2016 amendment that created the NJ Transportation Trust Fund so that all state gasoline tax revenues would be locked in for use in state transportation projects. Environmental damages lawsuits are not the same as lawsuits to clean up contaminated sites. Environmental damages lawsuits are intended to restore some people-oriented use of the polluted land or water, such as creating usable public fishing areas, restoring public access to a water body for kayaking, or creating a public park. Recent major environmental damages lawsuits have had their focus in the state’s historically industrial cities where population is dense and green space is scarce. The proposed constitutional amendment would pay for construction, legal, and administrative costs for such environmental restoration of public natural resources.
This amendment was proposed as a response to the trend of diversions of state environmental damages lawsuit revenues from environmental restoration projects to the General Fund to balance the State budget of 2015, 2016, 2017 and the current Fiscal Year budget of 2018. The state constitution requires a balanced budget, and recent proportionally large diversions of environmental damages lawsuit revenues to help balance that budget have come under public scrutiny.
This proposed constitutional amendment not only restricts all revenues from environmental damages lawsuits to environmental projects, but also targets the restoration as close to the site of original environmental damage as possible. Permanent protection of a State natural resource at the damaged site or in the water region is also an approved environmental use under this amendment.
Reasons to Vote Yes:
- Ensure that environmental damages lawsuits awards would result in restoration of the specified damaged New Jersey land or water, or if not possible at the damaged site, then restoration or permanent protection of State natural resources nearby.
- Encourage the Department of Environmental Protection to continue to pursue lawsuits to restore polluted natural resources of the State so that the public can use them again.
Reasons to Vote No:
- Allow the governor and state legislature to continue to have the flexibility to use environmental damages lawsuit revenues for the General Fund in order to balance the state budget.
- The amount collected from a settlement may not be sufficient to complete a project once started. If funds are insufficient, additional funds may be required from the state budget for a project that was expected to be paid for out of settlement revenues.